Comparison of water footprint of HPP Fláje and HPP Přísečnice with consideration of allocation by the economic value of water reservoir purpose

Authors

  • Libor Ansorge Výzkumný ústav vodohospodářský T. G. Masaryka v Praze
  • Pavel Vojtko Vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta stavební
  • Veronika Hamanová Vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta stavební
  • Jakub Hrubý Vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta stavební
  • Martin Dočkal Vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta stavební

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35933/ENTECHO.2020.005

Abstract

The submitted article describes a comparative study of the water footprint of electricity produced in two hydroelectric plants operated by Povodí Ohře, a state enterprise, on the water reservoirs of Přísečnice and Fláje in the Ore Mountains. A gross consumption method was used to calculate the water footprint, which considers water losses from the reservoir at the level of the evaporation from the water surface. Since electricity generation on the water tank is only an additional purpose provided by the water tank, it was necessary to divide the water losses from the reservoir among the various purposes provided by the reservoir. Allocation based on the economic value of the individual purpose was used to allocate losses by evaporation to individual purposes. Water losses allocated to power generation account for less than 1% of total losses. The study showed that the water footprint of the electricity produced in the Přísečnice hydropower station is about 2 times larger than the water footprint produced in the Fláje hydropower station, mainly due to the different morphology of the two reservoirs. The water footprint value of the electricity produced in two hydropower stations assessed is comparable to literary data on the water footprint of hydroelectric power plants from the Czech Republic and the world.

References

Ansorge, L., 2020. Srovnání různých metod stanovení vodní stopy výroby elektrické energie ve vodní elektrárně Orlík – případová studie. Vodohospodářské technicko-ekonomické informace 62(4), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.46555/VTEI.2020.04.002

Ardente, F.; Cellura, M., 2012. Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(3), 387–398.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00434.x

Bakken, T. H.; Killingtveit, Å.; Alfredsen, K., 2017. The water footprint of hydropower production – State of the art and methodological challenges. Global Challenges 1(5), 1600018. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600018

Bakken, T. H.; Modahl, I. S.; Raadal, H. L.; Bustos, A. A.; Arnøy, S., 2016. Allocation of water consumption in multipurpose reservoirs. Water Policy 18(4), 932–947. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.009

ERÚ, 2015–2018. Cenová rozhodnutí. Energetický regulační úřad, Jihlava.

Gleick, P. H., 1994. Water and Energy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 19(1), 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.19.110194.001411

Grubert, E. A., 2016. Water consumption from hydroelectricity in the United States. Advances in Water Resources 96, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.004

Herath, I.; Deurer, M.; Horne, D.; Singh, R.; Clothier, B., 2011. The water footprint of hydroelectricity: a methodological comparison from a case study in New Zealand. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(14), 1582–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.007

Hoekstra, A. Y.; Chapagain, A. K., 2006. Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resources Management 21(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9039-x

Hoekstra, A. Y.; Chapagain, A. K.; Aldaya, M. M.; Mekonnen, M. M., 2011. The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan, London; Washington, DC.

Kadigi, R. M. J.; Mdoe, N. S. Y.; Ashimogo, G. C.; Morardet, S., 2008. Water for irrigation or hydropower generation?–Complex questions regarding water allocation in Tanzania. Agricultural Water Management 95(8), 984–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.03.008

Mekonnen, M. M.; Hoekstra, A. Y., 2012. The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16(1), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-179-2012

MZe; MŽP, 2019. Zpráva o stavu vodního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2018. Ministerstvo zemědělství, Praha.

Povodí Ohře, 2019a. Vodní dílo Přísečnice. http://www.poh.cz/vodni-dilo-prisecnice/d-2616 (viděno 23. 10. 2020).

Povodí Ohře, 2019b. Vodní dílo Fláje. https://www.poh.cz/vodni-dilo-flaje/d-2602 (viděno 23. 10. 2020).

Seják, J., 2010. Hodnocení funkcí a služeb ekosystémů České republiky. Univ. J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem, Fakulta životního prostředí, Ústí nad Labem.

Scherer, L.; Pfister, S., 2016. Global water footprint assessment of hydropower. Renewable Energy 99, 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.021

Šermer, A., 1961. Experimentálné vzorce pre stanovenie strát vody výparom z vodných nádrží. Vodní hospodářství 11(12), 544–547.

Šuhájková, P., 2020. Výpar z výparoměrných stanic VÚV TGM. Vodohospodářské technicko-ekonomické informace 62(5), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.46555/VTEI.2020.07.002

Xie, X.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, T.; Huang, Z., 2019. Regional water footprints assessment for hydroelectricity generation in China. Renewable Energy 138, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.089

Zhao, D.; Liu, J., 2015. A new approach to assessing the water footprint of hydroelectric power based on allocation of water footprints among reservoir ecosystem services. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, Water Scarcity and Integrated Water Resources Management 79–82, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.03.005

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Ansorge, L. (2020) “Comparison of water footprint of HPP Fláje and HPP Přísečnice with consideration of allocation by the economic value of water reservoir purpose”, ENTECHO, 3(2), pp. 7–11. doi: 10.35933/ENTECHO.2020.005.

Issue

Section

Peer reviewed articles